Skip to content

The Construction of the Canon: How Humans Decided What God Said

The Bible is routinely described as the "Word of God" — a divine, inspired, and complete revelation. Yet the question of which books count as the Word of God was decided not by God, but by human committees with political agendas, theological biases, and competing institutional interests. The canon was not discovered; it was constructed.

What Is a Canon?

The word "canon" comes from the Greek kanon, meaning a rule or measuring rod. A biblical canon is the official list of books considered authoritative scripture. Different Christian denominations have different canons to this day: the Catholic Bible has 73 books, the Protestant Bible has 66, and the Ethiopian Orthodox Bible has 81. If the canon were divinely determined, you would expect universal agreement. There is none.

The Hebrew Bible (Tanakh)

The Hebrew canon was not finalized in a single moment. The Torah (first five books) gained authority first, likely during or after the Babylonian Exile (6th century BCE). The Prophets were added gradually. The Writings — including Psalms, Proverbs, Job, and others — were debated for centuries.

The Council of Jamnia (c. 90 CE) is often cited as the moment rabbinic Judaism settled its canon, though modern scholars debate whether it was truly a formal council. Even after this period, books like Ecclesiastes, Song of Songs, and Esther were disputed by some rabbis because they were theologically inconvenient — Esther, for example, never mentions God at all.

The New Testament Canon

The New Testament canon took even longer to stabilize. In the first two centuries of Christianity, dozens of gospels, epistles, and apocalypses circulated among different communities. The Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Mary, the Gospel of Peter, the Shepherd of Hermas, the Epistle of Barnabas — all were read as scripture by some Christian groups.

The selection process was driven by several practical and political pressures:

1. The Marcionite Crisis (c. 140 CE) Marcion of Sinope proposed a stripped-down canon: only the Gospel of Luke (edited) and ten letters of Paul. He rejected the entire Hebrew Bible on the grounds that the wrathful God of the Old Testament was a different, inferior deity from the loving Father of Jesus. The emerging proto-orthodox church rejected Marcion, but his challenge forced them to think systematically about which texts were authoritative.

2. The Muratorian Fragment (c. 170 CE) The earliest known list of accepted New Testament books, it accepts most of what became the canon but includes the Apocalypse of Peter and excludes Hebrews, James, and 1–2 Peter. It explicitly rejects Marcion's writings as "not received."

3. Athanasius's Easter Letter (367 CE) Bishop Athanasius of Alexandria wrote his 39th Festal Letter, which listed exactly the 27 books that now constitute the New Testament. This is the first time the modern Protestant NT canon appears as a complete list. Athanasius was fighting Arian theology at the time — the same political context that produced the Council of Nicaea.

4. The Councils of Hippo (393) and Carthage (397) These regional North African councils formally ratified the canon. They had no authority over the Eastern church, which continued debating books like Revelation for centuries.

The Criteria Were Human

What criteria did early church fathers use to include or exclude a book?

  • Apostolicity — Was it written by an apostle or their companion? But this was often assumed, not verified. The letters of Paul are genuine; Ephesians, Colossians, and the Pastoral Epistles are widely regarded by scholars as pseudonymous. The Gospel of Matthew was almost certainly not written by the apostle Matthew.
  • Catholicity — Was it used widely across the church? But this favored geographically dominant communities (Rome, Alexandria) over peripheral ones.
  • Orthodoxy — Did it agree with the developing "rule of faith"? This is circular: the canon was partly used to define orthodoxy, and orthodoxy was used to define the canon.
  • Antiquity — Was it old? But this was manipulated; pseudonymous texts were written deliberately to appear ancient.

What Was Excluded — and Why It Matters

The texts that were excluded are illuminating:

  • The Gospel of Thomas contains sayings of Jesus that emphasize inner gnosis rather than faith in Christ's death and resurrection. Inconvenient for the emerging sacrificial theology.
  • The Gospel of Mary portrays Mary Magdalene as the most spiritually advanced disciple, superior to Peter. Inconvenient for male ecclesiastical authority.
  • 1 Enoch was hugely influential in early Judaism and is quoted directly in the canonical letter of Jude — but it was excluded from the Hebrew and Protestant canons. It survives as scripture only in the Ethiopian church.
  • The Shepherd of Hermas was considered scripture by Irenaeus, Clement of Alexandria, and Origen — three of the most important early church fathers — but was eventually excluded.

The excluded texts didn't disappear because they were false. They disappeared because they were politically inconvenient, geographically marginal, or ideologically incompatible with the faction that won the theological battles of the 2nd–4th centuries.

Conclusion

The canon is a political document as much as a spiritual one. It reflects the victory of one strand of early Christianity — hierarchical, anti-gnostic, Rome-centered — over its many competitors. The men who shaped it were theologians and bishops engaged in fierce institutional struggles, not neutral transmitters of divine revelation.

When a believer reads the Bible as the authoritative Word of God, they are, unknowingly, endorsing the editorial decisions of Athanasius of Alexandria, the Council of Carthage, and the political pressures of the late Roman Empire. The Word of God, it turns out, passed through a great many human hands before reaching yours.